ModelRefs / o4 Mini vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding Co…
o4 Mini vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding Co…
o4 Mini vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
o4 Mini: o4 Mini is OpenAI's next-generation efficient reasoning model adding vision support to the mini reasoning tier. It is optimized for agentic tasks requiring both image understanding and step-by-step logic at low cost-per-task.
Context window: o4 Mini accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Qwen2.5-VL 72B up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
o4 Mini vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B at a glance
| Attribute | o4 Mini | Qwen2.5-VL 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Released | 2025-09-01 | 2025-01-26 |
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input price | $1.1/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Output price | $4.4/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Licence | Proprietary | Qwen |
| Self-hostable | No, hosted only | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: o4 Mini 63%, Qwen2.5-VL 72B 100%. Qwen2.5-VL 72B leads on this dimension.
- Reasoning: o4 Mini 78%, Qwen2.5-VL 72B 75%. o4 Mini leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to o4 Mini vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding Co….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, o4 Mini or Qwen2.5-VL 72B?
o4 Mini and Qwen2.5-VL 72B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is o4 Mini cheaper than Qwen2.5-VL 72B?
Compare $0.00110 vs $0.00000 on this page.