ModelRefs / Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B — Benchmarks, Pricing &…
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B — Benchmarks, Pricing &…
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Context window: Mistral Small 3.1 accepts up to 128,000 tokens, Qwen2.5-VL 72B up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B at a glance
| Attribute | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba |
| Released | 2025-03-17 | 2025-01-26 |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input price | $0.1/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Output price | $0.3/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Qwen |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Reasoning: Mistral Small 3.1 67%, Qwen2.5-VL 72B 75%. Qwen2.5-VL 72B leads on this dimension.
- Cost Efficiency: Mistral Small 3.1 95%, Qwen2.5-VL 72B 100%. Qwen2.5-VL 72B leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B — Benchmarks, Pricing &….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Mistral Small 3.1 or Qwen2.5-VL 72B?
Mistral Small 3.1 and Qwen2.5-VL 72B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Mistral Small 3.1 cheaper than Qwen2.5-VL 72B?
Compare $0.00010 vs $0.00000 on this page.