ModelRefs / Gemini 2.5 Pro vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing & C…

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing & C…

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs InternVL2.5 78B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.

Overview

Gemini 2.5 Pro: Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google DeepMind's experimental thinking model with a 2M-token multimodal context window, released in March 2025. It topped the LMSys Chatbot Arena leaderboard at launch and introduced adaptive reasoning budgets that balance response quality against latency.

Context window: Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts up to 2,000,000 tokens, InternVL2.5 78B up to 32,768. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs InternVL2.5 78B at a glance

AttributeGemini 2.5 ProInternVL2.5 78B
ProviderGoogleOpenGVLab
Released2025-03-012024-12-06
Context window2,000,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Input price$1.25/M tokensFree / self-hosted
Output price$10/M tokensFree / self-hosted
LicenceProprietaryMIT
Self-hostableNo, hosted onlyYes, open weights
Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision

Where they differ most

  • Cost Efficiency: Gemini 2.5 Pro 47%, InternVL2.5 78B 100%. InternVL2.5 78B leads on this dimension.

Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Gemini 2.5 Pro vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing & C….

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or InternVL2.5 78B?

Gemini 2.5 Pro and InternVL2.5 78B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro cheaper than InternVL2.5 78B?

Compare $0.00125 vs $0.00000 on this page.