ModelRefs / Phi-4 vs DeepSeek V3 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding Compari…
Phi-4 vs DeepSeek V3 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding Compari…
Phi-4 vs DeepSeek V3: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Phi-4: Microsoft's 14B dense decoder-only open-weight text model, trained on 9.8T tokens with a synthetic-data-centered curriculum and available through the microsoft/phi-4 artifact and Microsoft Foundry.
Context window: DeepSeek V3 accepts up to 128,000 tokens, Phi-4 up to 16,384. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
DeepSeek V3 vs Phi-4 at a glance
| Attribute | DeepSeek V3 | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Released | 2024-12-26 | 2024-12-12 |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Input price | $0.27/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Output price | $1.1/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text | text |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: DeepSeek V3 85%, Phi-4 100%. Phi-4 leads on this dimension.
- Reasoning: DeepSeek V3 76%, Phi-4 65%. DeepSeek V3 leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Phi-4 vs DeepSeek V3 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding Compari….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Phi-4 or DeepSeek V3?
Phi-4 and DeepSeek V3 target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Phi-4 cheaper than DeepSeek V3?
Compare $0.00000 vs $0.00027 on this page.