ModelRefs / DeepSeek V3 vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Codi…
DeepSeek V3 vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Codi…
DeepSeek V3 vs InternVL2.5 78B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Context window: DeepSeek V3 accepts up to 128,000 tokens, InternVL2.5 78B up to 32,768. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
DeepSeek V3 vs InternVL2.5 78B at a glance
| Attribute | DeepSeek V3 | InternVL2.5 78B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenGVLab |
| Released | 2024-12-26 | 2024-12-06 |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Input price | $0.27/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Output price | $1.1/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: DeepSeek V3 85%, InternVL2.5 78B 100%. InternVL2.5 78B leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to DeepSeek V3 vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Codi….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, DeepSeek V3 or InternVL2.5 78B?
DeepSeek V3 and InternVL2.5 78B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is DeepSeek V3 cheaper than InternVL2.5 78B?
Compare $0.00027 vs $0.00000 on this page.