ModelRefs / Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3.1 — Benchmarks, Pricing &…

Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3.1 — Benchmarks, Pricing &…

Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3.1: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.

Overview

Context window: Claude 3 Haiku accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.

Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3.1 at a glance

AttributeClaude 3 HaikuMistral Small 3.1
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Released2024-03-132025-03-17
Context window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input price$0.25/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$1.25/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
LicenceProprietaryApache-2.0
Self-hostableNo, hosted onlyYes, open weights
Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision

Where they differ most

  • Reasoning: Claude 3 Haiku 33%, Mistral Small 3.1 67%. Mistral Small 3.1 leads on this dimension.
  • Cost Efficiency: Claude 3 Haiku 83%, Mistral Small 3.1 95%. Mistral Small 3.1 leads on this dimension.

Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3.1 — Benchmarks, Pricing &….

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Mistral Small 3.1?

Claude 3 Haiku and Mistral Small 3.1 target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.

Is Claude 3 Haiku cheaper than Mistral Small 3.1?

Compare $0.00025 vs $0.00010 on this page.