ModelRefs / Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Mistral Small 3.1 — Benchmarks, Pricin…

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Mistral Small 3.1 — Benchmarks, Pricin…

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Mistral Small 3.1: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.

Overview

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Claude 3.5 Sonnet is Anthropic's mid-2024 balanced model that set a new standard for agentic coding tasks, achieving top results on SWE-Bench Verified and introducing computer-use capabilities. It remains the most widely adopted Claude model for production coding workflows.

Context window: Claude 3.5 Sonnet accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Mistral Small 3.1 at a glance

AttributeClaude 3.5 SonnetMistral Small 3.1
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Released2024-06-202025-03-17
Context window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input price$3/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$15/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
LicenceProprietaryApache-2.0
Self-hostableNo, hosted onlyYes, open weights
Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision

Where they differ most

  • Cost Efficiency: Claude 3.5 Sonnet 37%, Mistral Small 3.1 95%. Mistral Small 3.1 leads on this dimension.

Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Mistral Small 3.1 — Benchmarks, Pricin….

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Mistral Small 3.1?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Mistral Small 3.1 target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet cheaper than Mistral Small 3.1?

Compare $0.00300 vs $0.00010 on this page.