ModelRefs / Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing…

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing…

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs InternVL2.5 78B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.

Overview

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Claude 3.5 Sonnet is Anthropic's mid-2024 balanced model that set a new standard for agentic coding tasks, achieving top results on SWE-Bench Verified and introducing computer-use capabilities. It remains the most widely adopted Claude model for production coding workflows.

Context window: Claude 3.5 Sonnet accepts up to 200,000 tokens, InternVL2.5 78B up to 32,768. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs InternVL2.5 78B at a glance

AttributeClaude 3.5 SonnetInternVL2.5 78B
ProviderAnthropicOpenGVLab
Released2024-06-202024-12-06
Context window200,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Input price$3/M tokensFree / self-hosted
Output price$15/M tokensFree / self-hosted
LicenceProprietaryMIT
Self-hostableNo, hosted onlyYes, open weights
Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision

Where they differ most

  • Cost Efficiency: Claude 3.5 Sonnet 37%, InternVL2.5 78B 100%. InternVL2.5 78B leads on this dimension.

Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing….

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or InternVL2.5 78B?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and InternVL2.5 78B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet cheaper than InternVL2.5 78B?

Compare $0.00300 vs $0.00000 on this page.