ModelRefs / Claude 3.5 Haiku vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing &…

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing &…

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs InternVL2.5 78B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.

Overview

Context window: Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts up to 200,000 tokens, InternVL2.5 78B up to 32,768. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs InternVL2.5 78B at a glance

AttributeClaude 3.5 HaikuInternVL2.5 78B
ProviderAnthropicOpenGVLab
Released2024-11-042024-12-06
Context window200,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Input price$0.8/M tokensFree / self-hosted
Output price$4/M tokensFree / self-hosted
LicenceProprietaryMIT
Self-hostableNo, hosted onlyYes, open weights
Modalitiestexttext, vision

Where they differ most

  • Cost Efficiency: Claude 3.5 Haiku 65%, InternVL2.5 78B 100%. InternVL2.5 78B leads on this dimension.

Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Claude 3.5 Haiku vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing &….

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or InternVL2.5 78B?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and InternVL2.5 78B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than InternVL2.5 78B?

Compare $0.00080 vs $0.00000 on this page.