ModelRefs / Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek V3 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Cod…

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek V3 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Cod…

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek V3: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.

Overview

Context window: Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts up to 200,000 tokens, DeepSeek V3 up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek V3 at a glance

AttributeClaude 3.5 HaikuDeepSeek V3
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Released2024-11-042024-12-26
Context window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input price$0.8/M tokens$0.27/M tokens
Output price$4/M tokens$1.1/M tokens
LicenceProprietaryMIT
Self-hostableNo, hosted onlyYes, open weights
Modalitiestexttext

Where they differ most

  • Reasoning: Claude 3.5 Haiku 42%, DeepSeek V3 76%. DeepSeek V3 leads on this dimension.
  • Cost Efficiency: Claude 3.5 Haiku 65%, DeepSeek V3 85%. DeepSeek V3 leads on this dimension.

Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek V3 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Cod….

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or DeepSeek V3?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and DeepSeek V3 target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than DeepSeek V3?

Compare $0.00080 vs $0.00027 on this page.